Tag Archives: rational

I.S.S. livefeed switcheroo after 6 UFOs appeared

Did this really happen – what are the facts?!   Recently, the International Space Station livefeed video was cut, i.e. it was “suspiciously” switched from one camera angle to a different one (to show the inside of a briefing room).  And theorists claim this switcheroo was done as a coverup, after six UFO’s appeared in the scene.

Drudgereport.com, the popular news aggregator, selected this Sci-Fi-ish story for massive attention.  Clicking on the link takes you to Mirror.co.uk, the British media site.   Their general info states this:  “Do aliens exist? You can see for yourself with all the latest UFO news including sightings with pictures and videos. The truth is out there!”  That’s an interesting hook, but we’ve been doing serious scientific inquiry into the matter for a long time.  Let’s get into the news item, so you can learn from our unique approach. 

We already can follow the trail from Drudge to Mirror, but who posted the video which Mirror spotlighted?  That was a youtube channel by the name of Secureteam10.  Where did they get the video?  That was from the NASA government website.

The video may or may not have been retouched, edited, by the first or the second or the third parties.  We do not recommend that you take any time to watch it.  Because it could be misleading, due to the questionable nature of its condition and authenticity.

What we do suggest as the proper route to take when dealing with this “news”:  think rationally and make a coherent assessment.  The logical conclusion is that somebody is attempting to make you/us think that there are UFO’s, a.k.a. alien beings, interfering with human space engineering.  This is also predicated upon the quite fundamental assumption that, there is such a thing as “human space activity”!  Does any outsider know for certain that it exists?  In other words, whoever was originally purveying this unverifiable (so-called LIVEFEED) video footage, wants to cause the belief that there is indeed a space program worthy of interfering-with by alien beings in UFO’s which actually exist.  So they intend to kill two birds with one stone.

Perhaps that was too much for some of the newbies.  Let’s rewind because we don’t want to depend upon our “assumption-exposing”.  We do know that Drudge and Mirror and Secureteam10 are all showing a strong interest in this topic.  Also EnternetGlobal could be included in that category, because we are here talking about it!

However, all parties who show interest may have different reasons for taking interest.  Some may have ulterior motives.  Speaking for the motives and modus operandi of EnternetGlobal, we want everybody to think better, so our lives are better.  We seek Truth.  This could be an altruistic pursuit.  But we do not rest on those laurels, we still will always encourage the independent, free thinking of the visitors to our website and its contents.  Use your independent free minds to do real thinking and figure things out.  Do not ever take our word for it!  Don’t take anything for granted.

What we mean by the logical conclusion about this news item, is that not much can be proven by the evidence and circumstantial story.  First of all, what appears on video as UFO’s could be one of many things, not the least of which could be lens flare, but also retouched/added special effects.  We live in an Era of computer graphic animation technology, a CGI augmented reality (which is no longer real anymore).  Therefore, video proves nothing.  The only fact which is proven is that there seems to be a video to watch, but whether or not that was something documented from the real world is an unanswerable question.  Only if you were there to watch it with your own eyes, as an eye witness.

The other very suggestive aspect of the news story was that it stated, the livefeed was “cut” and redirected to another camera angle.  The immediate question should be asked, “how often do the camera angles switch on a regular basis?”  For example, with CCTV security feeds, the multiple camera angles are on a rotation of viewing.  Therefore, the implication of the cover-up could just be something for added-affect to the senationalized story!

What do you think?  Feel free to post a comment.