Kim Dotcom: “Let Me Assure You, The DNC Hack Wasn’t Even A Hack” read more at https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-18/kim-dotcom-let-me-assure-you-dnc-hack-wasnt-even-hack
Let’s respond and analyze the recent article which is broadcasting the latest squeaky-clean claims of Goldie Hawn. View the full article on the webpage of the MSM fake news https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/goldie-hawn-says-her-horrible-123546301.html
The actress attributes sexual misconduct to illness and narcissism.
Goldie Hawn has said she will “top all of them” with her experiences of sexual harassment.
The actress, 72, said she had some “horrible experiences” when she was a young dancer.
Asked whether the sexual harassment scandal in the entertainment industry should be addressed by people taking personal responsibility or regulation, she told CNBC: “I don’t think you can regulate that kind of human behaviour.”
She added: “You will be able to bring awareness to it. People will be able to make choices behind it. I think that there’s addiction.
“You’re dealing with sexual addiction. You’re dealing with narcissism. Narcissism is an illness.”
Discussing if sexual harassment is worse in the industry than it has been in the past, she said: “Sexual harassment, unfortunately it’s been there forever.
“I had some horrible experiences as a young dancer in New York City. I mean I’ll top all of them.
“I had a very strong mom, a very strong dad and I had a lot of resilience and I really knew who I was.
“And you know the answer was always ‘No, I’ll never get a job like that’.
“A lot of girls don’t. A lot of girls don’t know what to do.”
She added: “It’s pretty bad. I don’t know what this entitlement is (that) I think we’re seeing. Actually a lot of illness connected to it now.
“So this is partially an illness, not just a proclivity or just a feeling of need to do this.
“I think it has to do with narcissism, an ability to think that they’re invincible and they pretty much can do whatever they want to do.”
Did this really happen – what are the facts?! Recently, the International Space Station livefeed video was cut, i.e. it was “suspiciously” switched from one camera angle to a different one (to show the inside of a briefing room). And theorists claim this switcheroo was done as a coverup, after six UFO’s appeared in the scene.
Drudgereport.com, the popular news aggregator, selected this Sci-Fi-ish story for massive attention. Clicking on the link takes you to Mirror.co.uk, the British media site. Their general info states this: “Do aliens exist? You can see for yourself with all the latest UFO news including sightings with pictures and videos. The truth is out there!” That’s an interesting hook, but we’ve been doing serious scientific inquiry into the matter for a long time. Let’s get into the news item, so you can learn from our unique approach.
We already can follow the trail from Drudge to Mirror, but who posted the video which Mirror spotlighted? That was a youtube channel by the name of Secureteam10. Where did they get the video? That was from the NASA government website.
The video may or may not have been retouched, edited, by the first or the second or the third parties. We do not recommend that you take any time to watch it. Because it could be misleading, due to the questionable nature of its condition and authenticity.
What we do suggest as the proper route to take when dealing with this “news”: think rationally and make a coherent assessment. The logical conclusion is that somebody is attempting to make you/us think that there are UFO’s, a.k.a. alien beings, interfering with human space engineering. This is also predicated upon the quite fundamental assumption that, there is such a thing as “human space activity”! Does any outsider know for certain that it exists? In other words, whoever was originally purveying this unverifiable (so-called LIVEFEED) video footage, wants to cause the belief that there is indeed a space program worthy of interfering-with by alien beings in UFO’s which actually exist. So they intend to kill two birds with one stone.
Perhaps that was too much for some of the newbies. Let’s rewind because we don’t want to depend upon our “assumption-exposing”. We do know that Drudge and Mirror and Secureteam10 are all showing a strong interest in this topic. Also EnternetGlobal could be included in that category, because we are here talking about it!
However, all parties who show interest may have different reasons for taking interest. Some may have ulterior motives. Speaking for the motives and modus operandi of EnternetGlobal, we want everybody to think better, so our lives are better. We seek Truth. This could be an altruistic pursuit. But we do not rest on those laurels, we still will always encourage the independent, free thinking of the visitors to our website and its contents. Use your independent free minds to do real thinking and figure things out. Do not ever take our word for it! Don’t take anything for granted.
What we mean by the logical conclusion about this news item, is that not much can be proven by the evidence and circumstantial story. First of all, what appears on video as UFO’s could be one of many things, not the least of which could be lens flare, but also retouched/added special effects. We live in an Era of computer graphic animation technology, a CGI augmented reality (which is no longer real anymore). Therefore, video proves nothing. The only fact which is proven is that there seems to be a video to watch, but whether or not that was something documented from the real world is an unanswerable question. Only if you were there to watch it with your own eyes, as an eye witness.
The other very suggestive aspect of the news story was that it stated, the livefeed was “cut” and redirected to another camera angle. The immediate question should be asked, “how often do the camera angles switch on a regular basis?” For example, with CCTV security feeds, the multiple camera angles are on a rotation of viewing. Therefore, the implication of the cover-up could just be something for added-affect to the senationalized story!
What do you think? Feel free to post a comment.
EnternetGlobal gives you knowledge based upon facts and actuality (actuality is a term which might be more useful than using the distorted connotation of the term REALITY)
what we do is different than the MSM networks who tend to be delusional more or less. But let’s refrain from insulting any of those workers, especially not specifically. Suffice it to say that there is good reason for Gerald Celente , founder of Trends magazine, to be referring to those of the MSM ilk as “presstitutes”.
Those of us who know, we know! How it’s gotten so ugly is a telling of the history of American hegemonic corruption. Rotted to the core.
Are we ahead of the curve in realizing this? Not anymore ~ the masses are catching up! Everybody wants to know. They are seeking the Truth about all these issues. The MSM corporate lobbyist presstitutes are not trusted; that game is over because the gullibility has worn off.
EnternetGlobal has provided your further awakening! Tune in everyday!
‘”This is the nows”‘ EnternetGlobal will give you some important highlights from the recent President Trump “press conference”. It would seem to be a continuing struggle between the relatively-new Administration and the Mainstream Media (MSM), although President Trump has been stating emphatically that he wants to foster a better relationship with the press corp et. alii. It should be borne in mind, it takes two to tango.
Nonetheless, anybody with a thinking mind and rational cognition, will understand that there were salient points throughout this lengthy one-hour-and-fifteen-minute public briefing.
President Trump stated that, “It would be great if we had a good relationship with Russia”. and “That would be a good thing”. Just to be clear that the official policy is that: the U.S.A. would benefit from a harmonious and diplomatic connection with Russia. President Trump also declared, “Russia is a ruse”, referring to the negative spin on Russians, Prime Minister Putin, and international relations. Logically, some would agree and some would disagree. Perhaps we should take a “political poll”. We are going to examine both sides and the centrist position which is more neutral on the issue.
He slammed several of the large, corporate networks who were attending the event. They are the ones (of the Establisment MSM) who Trump and his Administration are exposing as dishonest and fake news purveyors. With one network immediately following-up on the defensive and reactionary position by stating that it was a “wild” and unprecendented press conference! Whether or not it is true that these career-liars are causing the whole problem, is a matter of opinion. However we do happen to know after exhaustive observation, yet we must remain un-biased in our stance. After all, this is the resurrection of objective journalism.
to be con’t.